The Hive Recap: Variation Under Nature
“We are your biological imperative now.” - Cosima Niehaus
The first rule of #CloneClub is, tell no one about #CloneClub. Finding out you’re a human clone is packed with psychological, moral and ethical issues. Sarah’s key conflicts in Season 1 include accepting the fact that human clones can exist, that she is one, and that she has to come to terms - as they all do - with some form of relationship to all the others. Our clones’ shared DNA means they share a common dilemma: who should they trust with the fact of their existence? To be a human clone in 2013 means you are a living body of evidence, proof of a great scientific accomplishment that is also a crime: someone somewhere broke the international scientific moratorium on human cloning, way back on the very day you came into being. Human cloning is not illegal in all countries, but it is banned in most. After the birth of Dolly the Sheep, and in consideration of humanity’s sketchy history with abusing science to ‘improve’ our species, the world’s more ethical cloning enthusiasts agreed that developing a human clone - after about 300 failed attempts to get one sheep - wouldn’t be right, on all kinds of levels. Thus, we have Alison’s theory: ‘someone is wiping them out, covering their tracks.’ The surprise is, just who the clones’ assassin turns out to be. As a grifter-clone, Sarah’s predicament is especially complicated, morally. Being a clone allows her to pose as Beth, and shadow the police hunt for Katja’s murderer. But the clones too have been ‘covering their tracks’, to protect their own identities and privacy. Sarah - who has faked her own death - buries Katja before she had any idea of what was truly at stake. A traditional cover-up plot might hammer away at the consequences of Sarah’s own physical evidence, posited at the scene. But in a real-world clone-related crime, the victim herself could expose their secret. Katja’s fingerprints, DNA, crushed face (when reconstructed) could expose Sarah Manning, Beth Childs - or any one of the clones whom Beth was originally able to identify using police databases and facial recognition programs. There is nothing like a common enemy to forge an unlikely alliance. The only people our clones can truly trust with their unprecedented reality at this point is one another. While Sarah and Alison are hellbent on keeping this stuff out of their own lives and plans, the assassin forces them to confront the situation together. Familiarity can breed contempt ...and vital insights; thanks to their individual strengths, skills and resources. They’ll set out together to stop their own slaughter, and ideally discover the truth about their origins. But can they do all that and not expose their loved ones to the explosive truth about themselves? [caption id="attachment_685" align="aligncenter" width="540"]
NEXT: Hive observations, unexpected results, and mind-benders >
The Hive's Own Observations and Unexpected Results
Variation Under Nature: Mind-Bender
The most difficult scenes in the series to shoot are those in which two and particularly three clones appear in the same scene. Scenes with more than one clone are shot first with one character, then again with another - and so on. The incredible hair, make-up and wardrobe that creates each clone’s distinctive ‘look’ takes anywhere from thirty minutes to an hour to perfect, depending on the clone. Equally rare is showing physical contact between the clones. Both of these cinematic feats are featured in this episode. [caption id="attachment_670" align="aligncenter" width="540"]



NEXT: Vist the Hive wet lab and library >
The Hive: Wet Lab & Library
“Show me a person who says their family is normal, and I’ll show you an orphan!” -Martha Frankel
Human Clone Fingerprints: Newton - Ask A Scientist! from the DOA Office of Science Nature vs Nurture: Outcome Depends On Where You Live The balance of nature and nurture in influencing how a child grows up varies depending on where they live, according to a new study. Beyond Nature vs Nurture "Researchers studying differences in how individuals respond to stress are finding that genes are malleable and environments can be deterministic."