Interview: Toby
Whithouse on
Cast Changes
for
‘Being
Human,’
‘Doctor
Who’

The Season 4 cast of 'Being Human'

CAUTION: SPOILERS AHEAD: You’re an acclaimed TV writer, and you’ve worked hard to make fans fall madly in love with your characters. You’ve cast charismatic actors in the roles, and they’ve brought great dimension to your creations, realizing them far beyond what you had imagined. Your show is a success.

But what happens when those stars walk away, seeking new opportunities? Do you pack it all up or do you risk starting anew, rebuilding your relationship to the audience with new characters?

Toby Whithouse has chosen the latter with his creation Being Human, the original UK supernatural drama that has its fourth season premiere on BBC America this Saturday (February 25) at 9/8c. The epic finale of Season 3 saw the tragic, wrenching departures of vampire Mitchell (Hobbit-bound Aidan Turner) and werewolf Nina (Sinead Keenan), and original cast member Russell Tovey (Nina’s werewolf lover, George) will follow them out the door early in the new season. Lenora Crichlow‘s ghost Annie remains as the only link to the show’s original roommate trio, with two new lodgers, vampire Hal (Damien Molony) and werewolf Tom (Michael Socha), taking up residence alongside her.

Meanwhile, Whithouse is a contributing writer on the long-running sci-fi series Doctor Who, which will see the exit of the Doctor’s married companions Amy (Karen Gillan) and Rory (Arthur Darvill) in its upcoming season. Among TV fanbases, Whovians are uniquely accustomed to change. (Doctor Who‘s lead alien protagonist “regenerates” or shifts physical forms, which has allowed 11 actors to play the role over 50 years.) But for the new fans brought in during Matt Smith‘s current run as Time Lord, the departures of his beloved cohorts Amy and Rory may be heartbreaking.

In light of these massive changes, we spoke to Whithouse about what we can expect in the upcoming seasons of both series, including a hint of his upcoming Doctor Who episode.

ANGLO: What was the greatest challenge that you faced when dealing with the departures of not one but three primary cast members on Being Human?

WHITHOUSE: I think the major challenge I think, to be honest, was to manage the panic of the fans. Because creating new characters wasn’t a problem in as much as creating characters is my job. And every time I sit down and write an episode of Being Human, there are new characters in it. That wasn’t the daunting part. I was worried that fans would lose confidence in the show, and they would be unwilling to tolerate such a drastic change in the DNA. And certainly there was a lot of concern from them when it came out. Which, you know, is understandable.

But to be honest I was always relatively sanguine about creating a new show or creating a new generation of the show. Its essential DNA, its tone, its levity, and its character, and its humanity, — I knew that that was going to remain the same. So many of the ingredients were still intact: I was still writing it, we were going to have the same producer. I was kind of confident that we would be able to survive this transition and still make a show that people would like.

And I have to say the response – ‘cause what we’ve seen now where we’re nearly halfway through transmission in the UK – the response has been absolutely fantastic. And the new characters have gone down an absolute storm, which is obviously a huge relief for us because that was a big concern. But so far the changes seem to have been much smoother than we kind of dare imagined. And there have been a couple of fans who’ve rather guiltily confessed that they don’t miss George or Mitchell or Nina at all. And the new characters are so compelling – the new actors are so extraordinary, they are – that it feels as though the transition has been pretty smooth, despite everyone’s concern.

ANGLO: Were you laying the groundwork for all of these departures in previous seasons, and with Tom appearing in Season 3, did you know he was going to take a leading role when you created him?

WHITHOUSE: To a degree. The thing is, the problem with having actors as extraordinary as Aidan and Russell and Sinead and Lenora is that other people are gonna notice [them]. And to have held onto them for as long as we did was much more than we expected. We’ve always known that we were just borrowing them from super-stardom. The fact that they stayed with us all those years was fantastic, and for which we’ll always be very, very grateful. So it really didn’t come as any surprise to us that they felt it was time to move on.

In terms of laying the groundwork, because we always kind of knew that that day would come – and it would be a bit reckless of us to assume that we’d be able to hang on to Aidan Turner for 12 series – and so I think in a way you’re always slightly preparing yourself for it. For example, in Series Two, I involved Mitchell in the Box Tunnel Massacre. I knew that that ultimately would be why the character left the show. Now whether [he left at] the end of Series 3, or Series 33, I didn’t know. But by doing that, I knew that would ultimately provide the route out of the show for that character. Similarly, when we introduced Tom, we knew that Russell would at some point move on, and so we wanted to create a safety net for us, so that we could move a new character in. We had to prepare ourselves for that inevitability.

ANGLO: Tell us about Michael and Damien Molony (Hal). What do they bring to the show?

Well, I think you have to look at it in context of the new lineup. Because Michael works fantastically well with our new vampire character. And similarly both of them work wonderfully with Lenora, who is still around for series 4. The whole dynamic has changed of the show. When you lose one character, it’s slightly a bit of a domino effect. You can’t really [just] slot a new character in; everything changes. But what Michael has and what the character of Tom has is a kind of brutality and physicality that the character of George never had. Because Tom is somebody who has no recollection of being anything other than a werewolf. He is somebody who is completely immersed in the supernatural world. Whereas George was someone who was relatively new to it and still struggling to adjust to it. And certainly for all of Series 1 was in denial of it, whereas Tom obviously doesn’t know anything else.

Similarly, with our new character Hal the vampire, he is somebody who’s been a vampire for over 500 years. She doesn’t really understand or remember anything else. And what that allows us to do is kind of refitting the essential drive and motor of the show, because ultimately, at the very beginning, this show was about people who wanted to re-discover their humanity, and for one reason or another had had their humanity taken away from them. And it was a quest for them to re-discover it. And by introducing these new characters, who’ve spent much longer in the supernatural world, that opens up a fantastic new story dynamic, because it means that journey to humanity for them is infinitely longer and infinitely harder, and involves much more deconstruction of their beliefs and opinions and so on.

Going back to your first question, in terms of the challenges of losing the cast, it was more than a challenge, it was an extraordinary opportunity, because it allowed us to reboot the show and to re-find the essential and original headline of the show, which is about people finding their humanity.

ANGLO: Luckily, Lenora Crichlow remains as Annie, who has really been the heart of Being Human? How important is she as a character?

WHITHOUSE: Lenora is the heart of the show. As we’ve lost George and Mitchell and Nina, Annie moves center stage in Series 4. The way that she has grown as an actress over the last few years has been absolutely jaw-dropping. I think that she is without doubt one of the best comedy actresses of her generation. In episode 2 of Series 4, she gives one of the funniest performances I’ve ever seen. And I remember watching the first executive screening. She left us absolutely breathless and slack-jawed. She was stunning. I think part of the reason she’s the heart of the show is she can turn on a dime. She can have you crying with laughter and then crying with sorrow in the next breath. She’s an extraordinary actress. And we’re incredibly lucky to have her.

NEXT: Toby’s thoughts on the next season of Doctor Who

31 Comments

  1. Freddie
    Posted April 22, 2012 at 12:51 am | Permalink

    Disappointed in season 4 finale. Bad enough that Aidan and George are gone…now Annie! It was a good ending for her though but, I doubt I watch next season.

  2. Amanda
    Posted April 22, 2012 at 5:17 pm | Permalink

    I loved the finale, I cried like I really lost someone. Can’t wait for the next season.

  3. Marisa
    Posted April 23, 2012 at 10:36 am | Permalink

    Im so happy to hear that this is the end of that rubbish Pond and Rory! and isn’t it about time to get rid of the Young Doctor too? I can’t wait for this next Regeneration it’s time for new blood.

    and really..a 25 year old bimbo for a companion? you can do better Moffat…maybe you should talk to Russel and Julie they always added interesting things and people to the show

  4. Julianne
    Posted April 24, 2012 at 11:18 pm | Permalink

    We would love to see Amy go. Far too much Amy in the shows. Bring back the Daleks, Cybermen, and good characters!!

  5. Julianne
    Posted April 24, 2012 at 11:18 pm | Permalink

    Get rid of Amy. There’s far too much of her. Bring back the Daleks, Cybermen, and the good characters!!

  6. Jamie Girard
    Posted April 29, 2012 at 6:37 pm | Permalink

    I can honestly say, my family and I have watched the last 6 seasons of Doctor Who about five times! We love it and will we will miss Amy and Rory as much as we have missed all of the other companions!

  7. Carol
    Posted April 30, 2012 at 11:07 am | Permalink

    I was concerned when the season started and wasn’t going to stick with it but it turned out well. My only disappointment was I wish we could have seen Annie reunited with her friends rather than it just being inferred and Nina and George get to see their baby.

  8. Posted May 5, 2012 at 4:38 am | Permalink

    nice one, kudos for this info

  9. Damian
    Posted May 10, 2012 at 8:22 pm | Permalink

    My father and I are huge sci-fi fans. We thoroughly enjoy doctor who series. My dad was a fan of the old black and white originals when he was younger, but I have to say we were extremely disappointed with this last season. Way too much sappy Amy and Rory. Felt more like a life-time (lady drama) sitcom show then some real (David Tennant and Christopher Eccleston) action. I am really sorry but if we have to watch some unnecessary plot filling, trying to launch-a-career garbage that focuses more on the side characters than the actual doctor, you will lose two more fans.

    What happened? I still piss standing up…

  10. JSlane
    Posted May 15, 2012 at 7:55 pm | Permalink

    I don’t get what people here have against Amy and Rory… I think they’re great. Better than Martha or Rose IMHO. They hold their own far more often than any other companion, they’re also their own comedic relief.

    Their family tree has gotten a little fudged up, with Amy meeting her future son-in-law(-ish) when she was 7. Not to mention that the childhood friend that she named her daughter after turned out to be one of her genetically altered daughter’s regenerations (hooray for paradoxes!).

    Still, I find the characters VERY engaging, and the Pond’s will be missed. I remember hearing that one of them is going to die (for realsies)… This will make me very very sad…

    Matt Smith isn’t much younger than Peter Davison was, so please stop calling him the Young Doctor… It’s just silly.

    As for the new companion? Bimbo is a bit harsh. They’ve said the character is supposed to be fast-talking and an intellectual equal (or as close to that as one of us mere-mortals can be) to the Doctor. Bottom line is, until her first episode airs early next year there’s nothing to complain about because we don’t know if she’ll be good or not.

  11. JSlane
    Posted May 15, 2012 at 8:14 pm | Permalink

    A few people have pointed out that they’re sick of the show focusing on the side characters… Steven Moffat has repeatedly said that he believes the Companions are the true focus of the show. That it’s their story, and the Doctor is just a major component of it. If you disagree with him that much, you need to take a harder look at what RTD did with Eccleston and Tennant.

    Look at RTD’s Donna Noble. When she first met the Doctor, she was a vapid opinionated bimbo (seriously, calling her dumb as a sack of bricks would have insulted the bricks). Then she meets the Doctor and her whole world gets turned on it’s head. Eventually she meets the Doctor again and they travel together for a while. During that time she showed an AMAZING amount of character growth… This is why the end of Series 4 is such a heart-breaker. She’s had her eyes opened to all these amazing things, she’s no longer the idiot she used to be. Then she has to be reset, have all of that growth wiped away, in order to save her life…

    You could view the entire 4th Series as the Donna Noble story arc. The Doctor was there, and he did take her on all these great adventures, but it wasn’t about him. It was about her. If you look back on it enough, very few episodes have been solely about the Doctor.

Post a Comment

To comment, click on one of the following:

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>