-
Featured
Top 10 Posts
-

12 British Actors Who Got Started In Soaps
-

J.K. Rowling’s Handwritten Notes Up for Auction
-

'Call the Midwife' Recap, Season 2, Episode 8
-

Diet Facts: Benedict Cumberbatch Is A Chicken
-

'Doctor Who' Recap: 'The Name of the Doctor'
-

'Merlin' Recap: 'The Drawing of the Dark'
-

WATCH: Britain Missing From Competition at Cannes
-

The Simpsons go to Downton Abbey
-

Brit Binge Watching: Five Sci-Fi Dramas You Can View Online
-

10 British Things About Washington, D.C.
-


Will You Still Love Robert Pattinson Tomorrow?
Specifically, he’s concerned that the films he makes from now on have to be successes, probably on a par with Twilight, if he is to avoid being typecast as a snaggletoothed vampire fella. This is not something he has had to bother his pretty head with until now, as he told the Observer:
“I had a three- or four-month window between each [Twilight film] during which I could do another job. But whatever I did, I knew that I’d have another Twilight movie on the way, which is theoretically guaranteed to make a lot of money. So I could always afford to fail.”
Not that Water for Elephants did badly, or indeed his role as Salvador Dali in Little Ashes.
As with anyone who now realises they’ve created a legacy for themselves, the concern is what that legacy will be: “If I do decide one day to stop acting, I just hate the idea of people going: ‘Oh, did you ever do anything else besides that Twilight thing?’”
Which is not, it’s fair to say, the kind of problem you or I have to worry about.
Thoughts? Ideas? Tell us here: