-
Featured
Top 10 Posts
-

WATCH: 'The World's End' Gets A Trilogy Trailer
-

'Doctor Who's Day Roundup: David Tennant Wins an Emmy; Karen Gillan in New Movie Trailer
-

Five Victorian Cocktails (Including 'The Cock Tail')
-

WATCH: ‘The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones’ Trailer
-

Russell Brand Makes MSNBC Come Over All Unnecessary
-

Dame Helen Mirren's Play Breaks Cinema Records
-

10 British Things About Abraham Lincoln
-

WATCH: Wowsers in Me Trousers! How Baseball Would Sound If Brits Were Commentators
-

PHOTOS: The Queen's Official Birthday and Trooping the Colour
-

Adele, 'Blackadder' and PJ Harvey Honoured By The Queen
-


Jonathan Franzen vs. Ian McEwan: Whose Books Do You Prefer?
But the Time Magazine-anointed “Great American Novelist” has been involved in a somewhat one-sided scrap with Ian McEwan, whom many might call “The Great British Novelist.” It appears that Franzen took umbrage when McEwan singled out Philip Roth as “the only major American novelist left.” Franzen has taken a bit of revenge on McEwan in Freedom, having one of his characters described as “struggling to get through” the British novelist’s most famous work, Atonement.
Franzen says he has since fallen for McEwan’s charms, however: “The first thing I did was send him a galley of Freedom as soon as it was out. Yesterday I got an incredibly sweet note from him – in spite of having a little dig at him in the book. He was wonderfully generous and now of course I’m totally disarmed. I think he must be a really nice guy. Did he say something about American novelists? I don’t remember!”
In honor of this remarkable non-feud, we’re setting up a transatlantic battle between these national icons – a Clash of the Titans, if you will. So tell us – which of these authors do you prefer? I was equally a fan of both The Corrections and Atonement (although the film version of the latter left me cold and even made me question how much I enjoyed the source material).
by Kevin Wicks