-
Featured
Top 10 Posts
-

Unseen Beatle Notes Are Generously Kept From Collectors
-

BBC AMERICA Previews Summer Programming
-

What Are Brits Watching: 'The Voice UK'
-

'Endless Love' Remake Gets Britished Up
-

So THAT'S What Happened To Baby Jane!
-

Prepare To Be Winded By The New 'Man Of Steel' Trailer
-

Auction: ‘Downton Abbey’ Servant for an Evening
-

'Doctor Who's Day Roundup: Steven Moffat, Matt Smith, and Jenna Coleman Accept Peabody Award
-

Bearded Riff-Raff Invade The Chelsea Flower Show
-

Wait, Wait, John Barrowman's New Show Is Called WHAT!?
-


The Face of the “Real” James Bond: Why the “Research” Sucks
Science and art…never the twain shall meet. As if Daniel Craig hadn’t already defined Ian Fleming‘s fictional spy anti-hero, researchers have attempted to get inside the late author’s head and determine the face of the “real” James Bond, reports The Times. Off the bat, the methodology used in the research is bogus. Using a technique called “prototyping,” researchers morphed the faces of seven actors Fleming originally wanted for Bond into one composite face.
This research, while fun to read, resolves nothing and shows the limits of how much science and art can mix.
And, oooh, I love the smell of anti-Daniel Craig propaganda in the morning. Get over it, Wiseman: Daniel owns 007 now. Craig, with his “thug” face, has given Bond an internal life that I’ve certainly not seen in another actor playing the role. That’s not to say that any of Fleming’s original picks wouldn’t have been equally as brilliant as Daniel Craig. But they each would have brought something different, something unquantifiable, to the role. A Richard Burton Bond would appear like a whole different species of man next to a David Niven Bond. Fleming had initially been resistant to Sean Connery, but he eventually warmed up to Connery’s unique take on Bond.
Oddly, The Times notes that the composite Bond most resembles this much-derided 007 actor.
As far as Craig’s looks are concerned, he quite resembles Patrick McGoohan, who was one of Fleming’s original choices. Although The Prisoner never looked quite like this…
Note: I can always find an excuse to post that photo.
If the English, the Scottish, the Welsh, and the Irish are all the same, why can’t they all just get along? That’s the question many are asking after yesterday’s New York Times article that cited research stating there are little, if any, genetic differences between the various British groups and the Irish.
But even the researchers themselves know that this will resolve none of the conflicts between the groups. Why would they think it would? Would the Englishman suddenly embrace his newfound Scottish brother? Hell no. He’d say, “Go feck yaself, ya sodding haggis eater.” Something along those lines…
In other news: